|
Peter O'Neill's
April 2009 contribution to Southern Rural Life
At
this time of the season, those of you who
are keen hunters may be focusing on shooting
a trophy stag, or getting a bag of ducks on
opening weekend, but the autumn period is a
good time for people to sit back and examine
their businesses and set budgets, both
financial and physical, for next season.
Having a business plan in place can make
this job easier.
A
business plan should:
-
State your goals and objectives in the
short term (<2yrs), medium term (3-10
years) and long term (> 10 years).
-
Include a historical analysis of the
business both financial and physical.
-
A SWOT analysis of the business i.e.
Strengths and Weaknesses, which are
internal factors that attributes of the
business itself; and Opportunities and
Threats, which are factors expected to
be present in the environment in which
the business operates.
-
A strategic plan which sets out the
overall direction of the business and
the primary targets and objectives
-
Operational plan; which explains how you
intend to deliver on the plan and the
key monitoring you need to do
I think it is
important for all business to have a plan as
it gives you a frame work to go by. Remember
the business plan must be updated regularly
as you achieve the goals set, and your
circumstances change over time. All your
budgets should be geared towards achieving
the goals and targets set in this plan.
Finally good luck to those keen duck
shooters, and don’t forget when you get home
to sit down and examine your business.
[top]
Peter O'Neill's March 2009 contribution to Southern Rural Life
Much needed rainfall arrived over much of the province late February; this should give a much needed boost to
pasture growth rates and winter crop yields. Extending the rotation in an effort to lift overall pasture covers
and enabling production well into May is the key at this time of year. Pasture is always the cheapest source of
feed, careful allocation and manipulation of rotation lengths and stocking rates is required to fully utilize
this feed.
Cow condition is often compromised in the autumn which can have a detrimental effect on production next season.
Drying off lower body condition score cows, early, is recommended so that optimum body condition scores are
reached at calving. Milking frequencies can be adjusted, which can help to improve body condition score. Once a
day milking or 16hour milking are two options; both of which I have used in the past with great success.
The numbers of cows to kill this autumn will overflow any works space available. Cull cows should be identified and
space booked early so cull stock are not eating into winter pasture covers. Any initial loss in production from these
cows is made up by milking the remaining cows for longer, due to the lower stocking rate and overall demand per hectare.
Winter grazing prices seem to be a hot topic at the moment. It seems that there is a gap between the price farmers are
willing to pay and what graziers are prepared to take. I’m sure sense will prevail and an acceptable market price will
be agreed upon, that is profitable for all parties concerned. There seems to be an oversupply of feed available, which
will dictate the market price.
Determining staffing levels for next season, and sourcing staff, is often one of the major projects undertaken over the
autumn months. Talking to staff about their intentions for next season and what you can offer is advisable so there are
no surprises. Some people may be thinking of cutting costs by employing less staff and working more hands on themselves.
This is an option, but careful consideration should be given to the implications to yourself and your family.
Finally stay positive, and focus on areas of your business you can change that can improve profitability. Keep
the lines of communication open, particularly with your family, friends and staff; also industry professionals
involved in your business.
[top]
Simon Glennie's ORC March report
Pasture update for March 2009
Recent rains in Eastern areas have come as a welcome relief for many as Autumn conditions prevail. The
prediction for the period ahead is for normal rainfall in Eastern areas and normal to below normal for
the south and west. Most farmers would be happy with this picture with the exception of the odd grain
farmer in North Otago who would have preferred the rain earlier. Many farmers who had killed potential
replacements in last season’s dry have either sown an additional feed crop with the intention of grazing
dairy stock or are looking to top up capital stock numbers. Most feed crops have established and
performed well to date which suggests there may be a surplus of supplements available in winter,
particularly if the forecast cull cow kill proceeds.
Nutrition - parasites
A common talking point among farmers recovering from dry conditions is how lambs in particular struggle
to adjust to the change in feed available to them as pastures recover to be lush and green. While we
expect an instant return to high growth rates, often reality is very different with scouring and low
weight gains. In dry matter terms the feed ingested is likely to have much lower dry matter content post
rain and the rumen requires a period of adjustment to the new feed. Another issue is the triggering of
internal parasite larvae to hatch and climb up the leaf in the film of moisture to continue the cycle.
As it takes a period of time for ingested larvae to shed eggs as adults, the damage to gut wall in the
interim is likely to cause a production loss.
Feed situation comment
The crystal ball tends to come out at this time of year as farmers try to predict what the markets will do
and how the playing field has changed. We know that global markets are in crisis mode but are not sure of
when or if it will impact behind the farm gate. There is a chance that people will trade down in terms of
choice, favoring the bulk commodities such as beef. Dairy commodity prices have tumbled rapidly from record
highs and results are being felt on high debt operations. Lamb has been buffered by a drop in the dollar
and a global decline in supply helping to underpin prices. The impact behind the farm gate is the lack of
security as markets flux resulting in significant policy changes. A year ago, the crystal ball was portraying
a bleak future for sheep and a rosy outlook for dairy and many farmers made policy changes to include a dairy
support component. Today the brakes have come on the dairy expansion and costs are being scrutinized including
off farm grazing. The crystal ball now suggests a supplementary feed surplus and a late round of negotiations
to secure winter grazing at a lower price.
Variation and planning
One could expect farmers to throw up their hands in dismay as the playing field is changing much faster than it
is possible to change farm systems. Some farmers will look for alternative policies that can compare with cow
grazing for returns. One answer does not fit all as different feed types, length of term along with debt and
risk comes into play. It is important to consider all of the implications of a policy change, particularly the
impact on core operations. For dairy farmers this may be having the correct cow numbers on hand to utilize spring
feed next season. For sheep farmers it may be ensuring sufficient ewe feed available to achieve high lambing %
next spring. Once again planning and consideration of feed requirements to meet critical needs of stock is required.
Another aspect is to consider whether policies and predictions are feasible and realistic.
Key points
- parasites numbers can spike quickly following a dry period – be vigilant
- plan any policy changes and review longer term ramifications
[top]
Keep purchased feed costs to 5% of milk payout
AbacusBio dairy consultant, Peter O'Neill, talks to Country-Wide about some of the strategies
and tactics dairy farmers may consider in the wake of the forecasted dairy payouts for the next few
seasons (also available at
http://www.country-wide.co.nz/article/10417.html).
Article written by Gerard Hall, Country-Wide Publications Ltd.
Lower cost pasture-based systems are likely to be more profitable rather than those that
have become reliant on costly bought-in feed, says Dunedin-based consultant Peter O'Neill.
He says the drop in dairy payout is not unexpected. What has surprised farmers and caught
them unaware is the magnitude and speed of the drop in the forecast. When this is combined
with the incessant creep that has occurred in farm working expenses (FWE), farm cashflows
can be challenging.
While dairy farmers have no control of the payout, they do have control of costs of production.
Before Christmas, Westland Milk alerted its shareholders of the drop in its forecast for this
season from a range of $5.20-$5.60/kg MS to $4.10-$4.50/kg MS. Last season it paid suppliers
$8.29/kg MS.
Last season Fonterra paid $7.90/kg MS, in 2006-07, $4.35/kg MS and 2005-06, $4.10/kg MS.
O'Neill says Fonterra's average payout for the past seven years is $4.86/kg MS. While
yet to be banked, a payout of $5 or better this season is still above average.
O'Neill suggests costs of production (farm working expenses) regardless of payout should be
no more than 50-55% of payout. He also adds that a lid needs to be kept on buying-in feed costs;
they should be no more than 5% of payout.
He suggests dairy farmers look again at their stocking rates and concentrate on their strengths,
which includes growing grass and doing the basics better. This includes maintaining an optimum balance
between pasture production, stocking rates, per cow and production/ha, and the levels of inputs.
"For some, additional profits will come from accepting lower per cow, per hectare production at a
lower input cost. Simply doing 480kg MS/cow or 1800kg MS/ha is no longer necessarily the most profitable."
O’Neill urges farmers to keep lines of communication open, make the time to revise year-to-date, end
of year projections and next year's budgets. Begin the new season's budget with zeros in each column.
Work through budgets and identify status quo and medium term breakeven points at full maintenance. Then
identify breakeven payout and breakeven production levels.
O'Neill continues to encourage clients to set targets and strive for them, but not at any cost. Knowing the
various breakeven points of any business and what drives them is a valuable exercise and are useful tools
when working through options. They help drive planning and business strategies. Benchmarking your business
against others is another valuable exercise and identifies opportunities.
Keep track of performance throughout the year and stay in touch with your banker, accountant and consultant.
If farmers have not already done it they should review provisional tax payments and livestock taxation options
and their impact.
Discuss the merits of which livestock taxation options, herd scheme and/or national standard cost (NSC) fits
your plans.
Farm owners and sharemilkers who have increased herd numbers may have the choice of electing herd scheme or NSC
values. One issue can be the requirement to give Inland Revenue two years notice in writing of an intention to
change or plan to exit the herd scheme.
Last month's fertiliser price adjustments and another downward movement in mortgage interest rates will offset
some of the drop in income. O'Neill suggests those locked into higher interest rates should discuss with their
bankers the worth of breaking some fixed mortgages.
Nutrient budgets should be revised. Consider soil testing and making informed, strategic and tactical use of
all fertilisers including nitrogen (N) fertilisers. Spreading effluent over a wider area of the property may
be an option to lower fertiliser costs. Another is just applying maintenance.
Animal health-wise, adopting SAMM plan recommendations (strategic use of dry cow) at drying off may be more cost
effective than using blanket dry cow therapy. If mating records are accurate savings may be made by only pregnancy
testing cows once.
Determine the need before drenching with an anthelmintic, and if required consider the costs of using a pour on
anthelmintic compared to an oral treatment. When controlling lice the use of a specific lice control treatment
may be more cost effective than a combination type pour-on.
Closely question capital expenditure, is it really a need or simply a want? Keep plant replacement costs to a
minimum. Maintain maintenance schedules of existing plant. Will plant due for replacement do another season?
Consider using contractors and avoid having money tied up in expensive, depreciating machinery.
With this season's cull cow kill expected to begin earlier, avoid delays by contacting your company representative
and booking works space for all cull animals. There is little point having them chomping their way through winter
covers any longer than necessary.
The drop in cow values along with interest rates is an opportunity for young sharemilkers to move up to herd ownership
(50/50 sharemilking) or expand current herd size.
Meanwhile the fall in Fonterra's share price may also create additional pressures for those planning to produce
extra milksolids this season and having to share up at $5.57/share. The fair value share (FSV) for this season
is $5.57.
This compares with Fonterra's December announcement that next seasons FSV would be $4.47, $1.10 less. Although this
will have an effect on cashflow, O'Neill believes the increase in overall asset more than compensates for this cost.
He bases this on valuing a dairy farm at $40kg MS. However, those buying shares for a new conversion or planning to
purchase an existing dairy farm the $1.10 drop in share price is to their advantage.
O'Neill says the drop in payout will lead to stronger business disciplines and more resilient businesses. As well
as questioning where money is spent, he believes there is no better time than now to refocus on those areas of
business that are performing and those where improvements can be made.
[top]
Technology to help boost genetic gain
Peter Amer discusses Accelerator products in the February Country-Wide (available at
http://www.country-wide.co.nz/article/10365.html). Article written by Gerard Hall
Country-Wide Publications Ltd
Ram breeders have several new breeding tools to assist them deliver the increased rates of genetic gain
their clients are demanding of them.
Developed by AbacusBio's Peter Amer they are designed to add further value to current pedigree and genetic
evaluation systems.
Dunedin-based Amer says SIL ANI-Mate and ANI-Mate Advanced are two in a suite of services offered as part of
the AbacusBio team's Accelerator package.
SIL Ani-mate provides ram breeders with a relatedness table or alternatively ‘ready-to-draft' mating list for
selected rams and ewes which increase the likelihood of breeding greater numbers of elite animals and at the
same time reduce the impact of inbreeding.
The relatedness tables match each ewe in the stud flock against candidate rams and shows the degree of inbreeding
that may result in the progeny from each of the different matings.
Amer say the lists can be used on their own, or alternatively, to fine tune mating groups provided as part of the
SIL Ani-Mate mating listings prepared to keep inbreeding to a predefined minimum.
Having ‘ready to draft' mating lists also saves valuable time when sorting up mating groups in the yards and increases
the flexibility of the breeding programme.
As a well as controlling all matings between direct relatives, Ani-Mate enables all sire-daughter and parent-progeny matings
to be avoided.
Rams are assigned to ewes according to the breeders preferred selection strategy.
This could include mating ‘best-to-best, (high-to-high) or high-to-low using the breeders' choice of SIL indexes or breeding values
(BV) or focusing solely on minimising inbreeding in the progeny.
Available in user friendly e-report format, the listings are easy to use and sort through. They can be quickly printed off for use
when fine tuning individual matings in the yards or they can be directly viewed from a computer screen at the side of the drafting
race.
Breeders simply advise their SIL bureau which rams they intend using and the tag number of any rams they intend to put to particular
age groups such as just the ewe hoggets or two-tooth ewes. SIL Ani-Mate then assigns ewes to rams on the basis of minimal inbreeding
and the breeder's selection strategy.
A ram usage summary, a backup ram list, a simple ewe mating list and a comprehensive ewe mating list are among the four reports.
Amer says a more customised service, Animate Advance, is now available to cater for those breeders that have specific requirements
when planning their mating groups.
It is able to cater for a wide range of situations including large flocks, multiple sire joinings and where complex preferential
mating systems are being used.
Ani-Mate Advance develops specific individual and group mating plans by analysing SIL breeding value,
index and pedigree data. This creates the opportunity for breeders to increase the likelihood of producing
greater numbers of elite animals while reducing the impact of inbreeding in both the short and long-term.
Ani-Mate Advance does this using a number of techniques including assortative (random) or best-to-best
mating, the use of tactical and strategic inbreeding controls and relatedness profiling.
Amer says each of the techniques can be used individually or in combination depending on the needs of the
individual breeder.
Along with best-to-best and random mating, Ani-Mate applies several inbreeding control strategies that can
be put in place to carefully manage the overall relatedness among selected parents while maintaining the
highly valuable genetic diversity within a flock.
When purchasing their flock rams, farmers are looking primarily for a good solid team of rams that will
on average deliver the increased rates of genetic gain they are now demanding. In a team of four rams,
one super star and three duds is not the answer.
Amer says mating ‘best-to-best' increases the spread of breeding values in the next generation so
the chance of producing an exceptionally high breeding value animal increases.
However he points out when compared with random mating the average breeding values of the animals in
the next generation remains largely unchanged.
Because the highest ranking rams in a flock are more often related to the highest ranking ewes than to
the lowest ranking ewes and resulting elite progeny are expected to contribute to future generations,
the use of random mating can lead to rates of inbreeding going unnoticed.
As a result Amer suggests best-to-best mating should only be used in tandem with Animate tools that assist
in managing rates of in-breeding.
One variation of the best-to-best option allows specific rams to be allocated to groups of ewes with specific
characteristics. These may be ewes belonging to a specific breed or cross or those identified with a genetic
merit or weakness in a particular trait.
Such a situation may be in a composite flock where the breeder might be looking to identify a ram with high
genetic worth for a trait such as growth or number of lambs weaned (NLW) to mate with ewes with the lowest
growth or NLW BVs.
Amer says the expected increase in annual rates of genetic gain when using best-to-best mating when compared
with random mating can be in the order of 5-10%.
In the long term levels of inbreeding will continue to build up in closed flocks even when tactical strategies
are in place to avoid mating closely related animals.
However having in place the appropriate inbreeding controls gives breeders the confidence to select elite
individuals and retain elite rams knowing the rate of inbreeding is being managed.
Amer says breeders are achieving this by avoiding matings of animals where the degree of co-ancestry or
relatedness exceeds a pre-determined threshold and by identifying teams of rams and ewe replacements so
that diversity of family lines is maintained.
Often the decisions to use a stud ram or not may be influenced by how closely it is related to the ewe flock.
In this situation Amer says relatedness profiling assists breeders make more informed decisions in the
knowledge that they are effectively managing future levels of inbreeding within their flock.
This is achieved by eliminating matings between selected animals where the degree of co-ancestry of relatedness
exceeds a threshold and also by identifying teams of rams and ewe replacement so that a diversity of family
lines is maintained within the flock.
Amer says not all rams have to be chosen in this manner and recommends breeders maintain a degree of flexibility
in the size of their ram mating groups is a key when considering whether to replace a sire in a ram team which
if left would contribute greatly to relatedness of selected animals.
In some flocks a large proportion of the ewes may trace back to a small number of sires or family lines. In these
flocks genetic gain may be compromised by the increasing degree of relatedness between animals complicating
selection and mating of young high genetic-worth rams.
AbacusBio is also able to generate customised selection indexes and breeding values designed to achieve specific
changes in levels of genetic merit for a specific trait.
Amer says when deciding which ewe or groups of ewes to join with a specific ram, breeders are often faced with the
trade-off increasing relatedness of animals within the stud may have on slowing down rates of genetic gain.
Amer says a review of the science shows both the number of ewes lambing and lamb survival rates drop as levels of
inbreeding rise.
Getting the balance right is important as a 10 percentage point increase in the inbreeding-co-efficient can result
in a 2% reduction in the performance for each trait.
"Once we have a snapshot of where a breeder is at in terms of their inbreeding, we can work out a programme to
reduce any further inbreeding and at the same time maximise genetic gain," says Amer.
[top]
Peter O'Neill's February 2009 contribution to Southern Rural Life
In the current economic climate it is hard to find a positive dairy farmer. Yes, payout has dropped but the
payout is still better than the long-term average over the last 7 years of $4.86. No one predicted the huge
drop in commodity prices from one year to the next but you have to remember what goes up must come down and
in farming’s case vise versa. Now is the time to consolidate. Take a good hard look at your business and
focus on profitability. Concentrate on cash flow, be flexible and quick on your feet and operate low cost
farming systems that are robust regardless of the payout. Revising provisional tax payments, with your
accountant, may help to improve cash flow.
Interest rates are at levels not seen for several years, hopefully you will be able to take advantage of this
and fix in some of your term debt at these low levels. Cow values are now at more realistic levels, combined
with low interest rates, making it easier for young sharemilkers to enter into herd ownership (50/50) contracts.
Remember you aren’t the only one who is feeling down. Talk to neighbours and industry professionals, a problem
shared is a problem halved. Farming is a food producing business; a growing world population still needs fed.
The demand is there for our product, we are just seeing a price correction due to inflated prices last season
and the sudden surge in world milk production due to these higher prices.
The main message I am trying to get across, is to stay positive, concentrate on lowering cost structures and take
advantage of any growth opportunities that may arise while things are at the bottom of the cycle.
[top]
Software allows breeders to customise
Neville Jopson featured in Country-Wide article (http://www.country-wide.co.nz/article/10254.html),
written by Gerard Hall, Country-Wide Publications Ltd.
Ram breeders should find it easier to match rams to clients' flocks with the help of a new software package.
The technology has been developed by AbacusBio for Sheep Improvement Ltd (SIL). It allows ram breeders to customise
breeding indexes to meet the objectives and production demands of each client's farming business.
RamFocus is one of a suite of services AbacusBio has developed for ram breeders as part of its
‘Accelerator' breeding package. The package uses SIL records to increase rates of genetic gain
in ram breeders' flocks. That then flows into their clients' commercial sheep flocks.
AbacusBio's Neville Jopson says the idea behind the development of RamFocus is recognising every
farming business is unique and has its own goals and aspirations.
Jopson says most sheep breeding indexes have been tailored to the industry's production averages,
or to the average of a segment of the industry.
While they do a good job for an average situation, the goals of some ram buyers are sufficiently
different that a customized index is worthwhile. Some are looking for rams with high genetic worth
for one or several specific traits and not others.
RamFocus has been designed to go this next step and allow breeders to customise the ranking of rams
for individual ram buyers. This means buyers are able to match the genetic merit of the ram team they
buy each year more closely to their farming goals and expectations.
Easily navigated, the software is simply installed on to the breeder's laptop. They then work directly
with their clients.
Clients are asked a list of 24 short questions about their property, including the performance of their
sheep flock, future breeding objectives and business direction. RamFocus develops economic weightings
for each of the traits under selection and builds them into a customised breeding index.
"This identifies for the ram breeder the key drivers that are required to move the genetic merit of a
client's ewe flock to the next level. It takes the breeding values and develops a customised index for
their clients to use at ram selection time."
Rams are then simply re-ranked in order of their new index. Those that best match the client's needs are
ranked from number one downwards.
Jopson says the economic weightings given to a specific trait are not necessarily the same for each buyer
as their sheep flock may have different performance levels.
When it comes to buying rams, there is no one size that fits all. For example, some farmers are very
concerned about drench failure while some are less concerned because there may be a low risk of a drench
failing on their farm. "Having a high or low risk of drench failure can alter the ranking of the rams."
This means farmers in a high risk situation are now able to place more weighting on drench resistance
when customizing a selection index.
Jopson also gives the example of the additional profit that may be gained by increasing lambing percentages.
It will differ from property to property depending on the lambing performance already being achieved within
the flock.
"On properties where the number of lambs born per ewe is low and there is the potential to increase lambing
percentage, the profits from producing an extra lamb is high. However when lambing percentages are already
high, the marginal value of an extra lamb born can be less because of the poorer survival of multiple-born
lambs, especially triplet borns."
On some properties the economic value of increasing lambing percentages may be negative.
Rams can therefore be re-ranked to identify those that will return the highest dollar return to their buyer.
RamFocus is simple to use and has obvious benefits. Adding it to the toolkit allows ram breeders to match their
clients with rams that have the best genetic merit for the specific traits they are seeking to improve.
The design allows ram breeders to use it as part of their client management system.
Ram breeders can focus on what is important to each of their clients and assist them when setting the future
direction of their breeding programmes. As well as displaying all the breeder's rams, the details of each ram
sale can be recorded. This includes who purchased it, the price paid and any general comments.
[top]
AbacusBio Breeder out now
click image to view pdf
Options for
farmers under the Emissions Trading Scheme
More and more farmers recognise the New Zealand Emissions Trading Scheme (NZETS) is here to stay
and want to work out how it will affect their farming business.
AbacusBio consultant Jorit Nϋhs says the NZETS could offer farmers good returns, with some of the
biggest opportunities in forestry and planting on currently unproductive land.
“We are working with farmers to make sure they are in a winning position economically and environmentally,
by demonstrating some of the opportunities available to them. We have
designed economic models to help
farmers compare the costs and returns of their current land and farm practices to new scenarios incorporating
the NZETS. The models also take into account potential risks associated with carbon credit pricing and market
fluctuations”.
What can farmers do to reduce their liabilities?
The aim of the NZETS is to reduce outputs which contribute to climate change, such as greenhouse gases.
This reduction is termed mitigation. Livestock are the biggest contributors of greenhouse gases in the
farming sector, with more efficient livestock having lower methane outputs per unit of product. Therefore,
standard measures farmers already use to improve livestock efficiency apply for green house gas mitigation.
These include working towards higher lambing and survival percentages and faster growth rates. Fertilser
application can also affect a farm’s greenhouse gas output and this needs to be balanced against livestock
efficiency. In the longer term, the Pastoral Greenhouse Gas Research Consortium (PGGRC) are aiming to have
a product on the market which reduces methane production in ruminants. Their website is well worth a visit,
see http://www.pggrc.co.nz/.
[top]
Forestry as a tool to hedge against the impact of the Emissions Trading Scheme
Forestry is now part of the NZETS scheme and it is helpful for farmers to be aware of new regulations and
opportunities in the sector.
The Government is currently providing incentives for afforestation alongside the NZETS. The Afforestation
Grant Scheme (AFS) is a grant to cover forest establishment costs, to encourage landowners to plant trees
where forestry is a good land use option. Under the scheme, farmers retain the value of the trees and the
government owns the carbon credits created by the first 10 years growth. Each AFS application is judged on
merit including other potential environmental benefits such as erosion control and improved water quality
though riparian management. For more information, go to
http://www.maf.govt.nz/climatechange/forestry/initiatives/.
Another scheme is The Permanent Forestry Sink Initiative (PFSI) which enables landowners to invest in
establishment of native forests and use the credits earned to sell on carbon markets or offset emissions from
their livestock operation. This scheme is appropriate where it is decided to change management practices on a
piece of land to actively encourage its reversion to native forest, rather than continuing to maintain it in a
marginally productive pastoral use.
For forest on land that is not designated as pre-1990 forest land, there is the option for landowners to become a
participant of the NZETS scheme itself, and earn carbon credits to sell on carbon markets or offset emissions.
The NZETS will have no impact on the management of forests on land designated as pre-1990 forest land, so long as
it is maintained as forestry. However, if this land is deforested and its land-use changed to a non forest land-use,
the landowner will be liable to surrender carbon units to the crown, equivalent to the carbon lost due to the
deforestation. This is a new liability for owners of pre-1990 forest land, and is triggered if more that two hectares
of forest is deforested within a five year period.
This liability is moderated by two mechanisms as below.
1. Landowners who own less than 50 hectares of pre-1990 forest can apply for an exemption, which will enable them
to change the use of the land without penalty. This is particularly relevant if there is some likelihood of the
land-use changing in the future.
2. For those landowners with more than 50 hectares of pre-1990 forest land or those with less that see no land-use
change for the forest they own, the crown is offering an allocation, free of charge, as part compensation for the
partial alienation of land ownership rights resulting from the implementation of the NZETS.
The landowner must apply for either the exemption from the NZETS or the allocation of units for any given piece of
forest land. If there is no application made for either, before the relevant cut off dates, the landowner will be
left with the new ETS liability and no way of moderating the effects of the ETS.
Key Future Dates for Farmers
-
The “Draft Forestry Allocation Plan” outlines the proposed approach to allocating New Zealand
Units (NZUs) to pre-1990 forest owners under the ETS. Submissions on this plan are due by 28 February 2009, so make
sure you read this and if you have concerns, have your say. For more information see
http://www.maf.govt.nz/sustainable-forestry/ets/information/
-
Farmers with forestry blocks less than 50 hectares who want exemptions from the NZETS need to apply by 30 June 2009.
Exemptions are also available for other reasons but do not happen automatically
-
We recommend farmers read the “MAF guide to Forestry in the Emissions Trading Scheme” at
http://www.maf.govt.nz/sustainable-forestry/ets/guide/
[top]
Feed young
stock well to reach production targets
Poor feeding of young stock is one of the main reasons dairy
farms fail to reach production targets.
Dairy farmer of 15 years and now AbacusBio consultant Peter O’Neill says young stock performance is often
compromised to feed milking cows better.
“Young stock are just as important as any other stock and it is really important to set target weights for them
and to monitor their progress.” Feeding young stock well will ensure they deliver high milk yields throughout
their life and rear healthy calves.
Some key questions to ask are:
-
What percentage of your heifers are starting their second lactation and how many of them are late calving or need
to be induced in that season? Aim to have at least 90% of your heifers calving the following year (as three year olds).
-
Are your six week in-calf percentages and empty percentages for rising second calving cows similar to the herd average
or industry targets? Industry targets are a six week in-calf rate of 78% and a nine week in-calf rate of 90% or more.
-
If you are not reaching in-calf targets, are you reaching target weight and condition scores? Target condition scores
are 5.5 for rising 2-3 year olds. Peter recommends the table below as an incredibly useful guide to the recommended
liveweights for maturing stock.
Table - Recommended liveweights for young stock according to their expected mature weight
(reproduced from the DairyNZ website
http://www.dairynz.co.nz/file/fileid/6358).
To view table please refer to the
AbacusBio Breeder pdf version.
[top]
Sheep genetic gain rate tripled since 1999
The rate of genetic gain in New Zealand’s sheep industry has tripled since 1999 according to a
recent study. AbacusBio consultant Peter Amer, who conducted the Ovita funded study, said it
had previously been difficult to measure genetic gain across the industry, but that has changed.
In the study Peter analysed data from the SIL ACE December 2007 run. ACE (Advanced Central Evaluation)
is a Sheep Improvement Ltd (SIL) initiative that allows across-flock and across and between-breed
genetic evaluations to be made for a number of key production traits in sheep.
“These increases highlight how successfully breeders and industry groups can work together to improve New
Zealand sheep genetics,” says Peter. “Rates of genetic gain were low and static prior to the introduction
of SIL. The rates of genetic progress are now three times the level they were when it was introduced in 1999.”
SIL’s introduction led to the rates of genetic gain doubling for both fast-growing, wool producing and highly reproductive
Dual Purpose Sire Flocks and fast-growing, high meat yielding Terminal Sire flocks. SIL ACE was started in 2004 and led to
another spike in genetic progress. It uses data collected through the Meat & Wool NZ Central Progeny Test (CPT) about the
industry leading sires to assist in creating linkages between flocks for analyses.
Which factors affect genetic gains?
The main factors that affect genetic trends as analysed in this study are:
-
Using older sires and longer generation intervals can slow genetic progress
-
The choice of outside sires typically increases genetic gain
-
In general, the use of link sires increases genetic gain
-
Flocks which recorded FE or FEC made about 50% higher genetic progress across all of the main sub-indexes.
However, the actual contribution of FE and FEC to genetic progress was low, so it is assumed these breeders made
greater genetic progress because they were more advanced in their techniques.
Improving poorer flocks an opportunity to grow industry
There are huge opportunities across the New Zealand sheep industry to improve on already substantial rates
of genetic progress, according to Peter. Wide variations in average flock merit and genetic progress mean
there is potential economic gain if poor performing flocks take advantage of the quality genetics available.
A spread of $5.00 per ewe in the Dual Purpose index would be worth $150 million to the industry per year.
Similarly, a spread of $5 in the Terminal Sire index over 10 million terminal lambs would be worth approximately
$25 million to the industry per year.
Using more rams from the best genetic flocks rather than rams from poor flocks could also create considerable
economic gains. An increase of 50 cents/year in the Dual Purpose index across the national flock would be worth
about $15 million and $2.5 million in Terminal indexes to the industry in the first year and cumulating.
SIL, CPT and ACE will continue to be vital tools in improving genetics in the New Zealand sheep industry.
To maintain genetic improvement rates and remain competitive with other livestock industries, it is vital to
continue educating sheep breeders and commercial farmers about current genetic tools and to develop new methods
such as DNA-based selection techniques.
How does this research affect breeders’ ram buying decisions?
SIL and the large-scale SIL ACE evaluation are powerful tools because they allow breeders to find the ideal sheep
genetics for their farming business. SIL breeders are increasingly participating in the SIL ACE scheme because it
makes it easier to compare the genetic merit of their sheep against other flocks.
By buying from SIL breeders and using SIL figures to select the ideal rams, farmers and breeders are maximising
cumulative genetic improvements in their flocks.
Peter says when buying a ram it is crucial to focus on these cumulating benefits of good selection rather than on
purchase price.
To view accompanying graph please refer to the
AbacusBio Breeder pdf version.
[top]
AbacusBio consultants developing new sheep breeding strategy for Ireland
AbacusBio consultants Tim Byrne, Peter Amer and Peter Fennessy are working with Sheep Ireland to develop and implement
a new sheep breeding strategy for their country.
Tim, who is currently in Ireland working on the project, says the idea is to increase maternal efficiency and reduce
costs in order to improve industry profitability.
“There has been a steady decline in the number of breeding ewes in Ireland over the last 10 years due to poor
profitability. Numbers are now at 2.7 million, down from 4.3 million in 1997. We need to rebuild the sheep industry and
this is a great start point”.
Traditionally Irish breeders used visual appraisal to select for terminal traits within their breeds, with a small proportion
of breeders using performance recording for a limited range of traits. The project aims to use new technology and Irish
Cattle Breeding Federation (who run Sheep Ireland) systems to integrate sheep breeding with electronic identification and
national identification systems.
“Increased recording to include more economically relevant traits together with a big effort to convince the
industry of the gains to be made from genetic improvement will increase uptake of performance recording by breeders and
the use of these improved rams by commercial farms .”
To improve commercial ewe performance, the emphasis must be on maternal traits that will lead to lower cost and easy care
sheep. The team are currently developing a national central progeny test and a number of maternal lamb producer (MALP)
groups to use the more accurate data generated from the breeding strategy.
The MALP involves commercial farmers recording data to identify which rams deliver gains in ewe performance in their flocks
and which ones do not. Data will feed back into the central database and evaluation systems to help participating pedigree
breeders identify superior rams. Participating farmers swap animals to create so-called “genetic links” that
allow genetic comparisons between rams from different flocks. DNA matching will be used to link lamb performance data to
their sires.
Ireland already has a national identification scheme for individual sheep and AbacusBio consultants are working with them
to link that with the new performance recording schemes. Tim is currently working with commercial farmers to implement the
MALP as well as developing protocols and systems to manage data recording and capture.
“I’m enjoying gaining more experience in different production systems and aim to bring back some new ideas for
the New Zealand sheep industry. New moves are afoot within the European Union for electronic identification to become a
compulsory part of national identification systems, with potential positive spinoffs for information management and data
capture for breeding purposes”.
AbacusBio consultants Peter Amer and Peter Fennessy have extensive experience in breeding programme development. The pair
were in Ireland in August to assist in the sheep strategy development. Amer has been involved in the Irish national beef
breeding strategy and development over the past 10 years, while Fennessy has extensive experience developing industry
strategies for genetic improvement of plants and animals in New Zealand and Australia.
For more information about Sheep Ireland see http://www.sheep.ie/.
[top]
Meat quality vital for our international markets
A new study of lamb meat quality found higher yielding, faster growing lambs produce meat with poorer colour which could
have implications for New Zealand’s sheep breeders.
Alliance Group Ltd conducted the study with AbacusBio consultants, Anna Campbell and Neville Jopson, to evaluate the effects
of genetics and pasture on lamb meat quality. The study found high yielding, fast growing animals produce paler meat that
is more brown than red. In international studies, selection for yield and growth has been found to adversely affect meat quality
in pigs, beef cattle and poultry.
Anna says breeding programmes currently emphasise growth rates and meat yields, but the emphasis may need to be
re-balanced to ensure meat quality remains high. Meat quality is increasingly important to New Zealand’s
lamb meat markets and is comprised of several traits. These include meat and fat colour, pH, tenderness and factors
affecting the eating experience such as taste, juiciness and smell. Nutritional qualities of meat, such as vitamin
levels, essential minerals (e.g. iron) and the types of fatty acids (e.g. omega 3) have become increasingly important
to consumers.
Anna and Neville have worked with Alliance to evaluate progeny from the Meat & Wool NZ Central Progeny Test (CPT).
CPT sires were used because they are the best in the industry across a range of breeds and the resultant database
is an excellent resource for evaluating previously unselected traits, such as meat quality.
Anna says another important finding was that colour stability traits had relatively high heritabilities, which means
they could be improved rapidly if included in a selection programme. The speed at which meat deteriorates (goes from
red to brown) had a heritability of around 0.4, that is, about 40 percent of variation in this trait is genetic.
Tenderness of meat which was frozen after 24 hours was variable with a number of samples exceeding 8kgF (which is
considered tough). The heritability of tenderness of frozen meat was moderate (at about 0.2) and reasonable progress
in selection could be made. However, there was little variation in tenderness of meat which had been aged for eight
weeks and none of the aged meat was tough (averaging 3kgF). Anna says while this finding is not surprising, it is good
to have these data to show the Alliance international markets that tenderness is not an issue for our chilled products.
Selection for pH levels in meat is not necessary, because variation is minimal and few sires had breeding values which
exceeded the optimal ceiling of pH 5.8. pH had a moderate heritability of about 0.2. The heritability of traits rated
by the taste panel (aroma, flavour, texture, succulence and acceptability) were low. This was to be expected as taste
panel measurements are subjective, and there are usually diverse results even with a panel of expert tasters, as in this
trial.
This work, fully funded by Alliance, is very important for our export markets and ensuring New Zealand lamb is viewed as
high quality. Anna says with increased international consumption of pork and chicken, we need to differentiate our New
Zealand lamb as being a reliable high quality product with high nutritive value. Alliance is working with AbacusBio again
next year to increase understanding of the relationship between meat quality, growth and yield.
A summary of this report can be viewed at http://www.alliance.co.nz/media_releases.html.
To view accompanying graphs please refer to the
AbacusBio Breeder pdf version.
[top]
New staff join AbacusBio Team
Peter O’Neill
Peter joined AbacusBio in 2008 after 20 years in the dairy industry. His experience in dairy farming ranges from
equity partnerships to share-milking to dairy farm ownership. This experience gives him an insight into the
industry’s complexity from the farm to the national level. A career highlight was winning Otago Sharemilker
of the Year in 2003 with his wife Ginny.
Peter works for AbacusBio as a dairy agribusiness consultant with clients and projects in Otago and Southland. His
experience and strong understanding of the technical side of dairying mean he can help clients achieve the mantle of
increased production and reduced costs. Peter also helps clients with other important aspects of their farm business,
including staff management, business growth, profitability, strategic planning and sustainability.
Jorit Nϋhs
Jorit brings his passion for the environment and a broad range of business skills to AbacusBio. He joined us in 2008
after finishing an MBA at the University of Otago. Jorit hails from Hamburg in Germany and studied business and
computing in Berlin. After completing his degree in 2003, Jorit worked at and co-owned a speech recognition software
development company “8hertz” in Berlin. As the director for professional services and consulting Jorit
was responsible for project management, implemention of speech recognition software and client relationships. In 2007,
he moved to Dunedin to do an MBA. As part of the MBA he worked as a consultant for Wenita Forest Products Ltd on climate
change and the impact of the NZ emission trading scheme on the forestry industry. At AbacusBio he continues to work in
the area of climate change, advising our farm clients on the threats and potential opportunities of the ETS by combining
farming and forestry and bringing the NZ ETS into a global context. In addition, he recently visited clients in Scotland,
where he is involved in the valuation of some new dairy technologies and the economic evaluation of genome wide selection
scheme options for the UK sheep industry.
Gemma Payne
Gemma specialises in bioinformatics and genome sequencing processes, along with researching DNA tests for livestock
improvement programmes. She has also processed large datasets produced by new sequencing technologies.
Gemma gained a BSc (Genetics) from the University of Otago, before moving to Brisbane to complete an MSc in Genetic
Counseling at Griffith University. She then did a summer internship on a bioinformatic project at AgResearch, Invermay,
before becoming a research associate there. She has been involved in the Ovine Genome Project, where her work has
included sequencing Romney, Texel and Scottish Blackface ewes using the 454FLX technology and validating sequence data
and associated bioinformatic processes. She was also involved in developing the WormStar parasite resistance DNA test.
Gemma joined AbacusBio in 2008 and has been involved in mathematical modelling work (Mathcad programme writing and
running), feasibility studies for patent applications, statistical analyses (ASReml), meat quality trial analyses and
validation of automated bioinformatic processes. She has also upgraded the AbacusBio website and is responsible for
website maintenance.
[top]
New offices for AbacusBio
We have shifted into bigger and brighter offices in the Public Trust Building on Moray Place, Dunedin.
Our telephone, fax and email contacts all remain the same.
Our new address is:
1st Floor
Public Trust Building
442 Moray Place
Our postal address is:
AbacusBio Limited
PO Box 5585
Dunedin 9058
[top]
AbacusBio consultants win awards for ground breaking sheep gene research
AbacusBio consultants Jude Sise and Tim Byrne won major awards at the New Zealand Society of Animal Production conference
held in Brisbane in June.
Jude’s paper, with the catchy title “SNP and cut: Quantifying the potential benefits of genomic selection tools for
genetic fault elimination in sheep” is about the potential to use genetic SNP markers in sheep breeding. Jude won
the Innovation Award for the conference paper showing the greatest advance in science and technology. By identifying
SNP markers associated with common genetic faults, testing for carriers before mating means the incidence of these
faults could be greatly reduced.
“Stud breeders routinely cull up to 30% of lambs due to a variety of faults,” says the abstract for her paper. Despite
this culling pressure faults continue to occur, suggesting recessive inheritance or insufficient identification of fault
causing genes.
“This would improve their [stud breeders] efficiency by reducing lamb losses and increasing numbers of saleable ram
lambs and ewe lambs suitable for selection as breeding ewes.”
In her paper, Jude and co-authors Ken Dodds, Benoit Auvray (AgResearch) and Peter Amer, showed how the use of the SNP
technology could have major benefits for both breeders and commercial farmers.
Discovering that dwarfism in some flocks of sheep was caused by recessive genes won AbacusBio consultant Tim Byrne the
NZSAP Young Members Award.
Tim’s finding, published as his Masters thesis at Massey University, means the disease can reappear after being hidden
for generations when a carrier ram is used. Little is known about the disease. However, dwarf lambs and sheep are
unproductive because they usually die young or are culled.
Currently, Massey researchers are working to develop a diagnostic test for the gene responsible.
[top]
Above all maintain a positive attitude
It is widely acknowledged that the world economy is in for a tough next 12–18 months and the New Zealand
economy will certainly not be immune. While there are signs the credit markets may return to some sense
of normality in early to mid 2009, the timing of the recovery of the real economy is open to wide speculation,
some opinions and many unknowns.
AbacusBio farm consultant Jack Cocks maintains key actions for managing farming businesses in these uncertain
times are to “concentrate on cashflow, be flexible and quick on your feet and operate low cost farming systems
that are robust under both high and low product prices.”
The commodity price falls we’ve seen over recent months have been a result of job losses and recessions in our
major export markets combined with increasing worldwide supply of some commodities. The lowering kiwi dollar
against the US, yen, and euro has provided some relief to these falls. Continued commodity price falls and less
willingness of foreign lenders and investors to fund New Zealand’s current account deficit may drive further
currency weakness.
Jack says that despite the challenges facing the agricultural sector there is still a general feeling of optimism
amongst our client base. Solid fundamentals of increasing global wealth and a growing world population driving up
real food prices still remain. However, what this current crisis has reinforced is that, in this environment of
increasing demand for food and low global food reserves, the one certainty is extreme volatility. Businesses must
be structured well and prepared to manage tightly through these volatile times.
When we look back at New Zealand agriculture’s history, out of adversity comes productivity growth, innovation,
and often an export led recovery. “Businesses with strong balance sheets can look forward to
opportunities to grow over the next 12–18 months” says Jack, “especially if they focus on cashflow,
flexibility and maintaining a positive attitude!”
[top]
Ewe lambs out, two-tooths in?
With large tracts of farm land being converted from sheep to dairy
to capitalise on the dairy boom, more than 100,000 ewes were up for sale at this summer's
clearing sales. Two-tooth ewes that would have sold for $130 in previous years went for
$50 this year. It was a huge opportunity for sheep farmers to snap up top ewes at great
prices, but how many ewes should a sheep farmer buy at the sales, and what is a good price?
AbacusBio farm consultant, Simon Glennie, hoped to answer these questions in a study he
conducted with funding from Meat & Wool's Farmer Initiated Technology Transfer scheme.

Simon's project looked at the impact of sheep farmers culling ewe lambs and poorer-performing
ewes, and replacing them with older ewes. While farmers could profit from this approach in
the short term, it was important to evaluate the effect a missing generation of ewes would
have over the next few years.
Farmers could do the maths on the back of an envelope
but they need to know what the ramifications are for ageing a flock and that is very difficult
to explain without a model, ” Simon said.
By modelling the impact on flock age, given
standard culling and death rates, Simon calculated break-even prices. The model projected the
effects over an entire ewe life-cycle, taking into account the need for farmers to compensate
for their increased culling rate. At $103 for two-tooth ewes and $87 for mixed-age ewes, the
break-even prices confirm the profit farmers stand to make by buying surplus ewes, but Simon
cautioned that every farm situation is different and the merits of the purchase (and a farm's
individual break-even price) depended on the quality of stock being replaced.
Simon also found
that each 1% increase in expected lambing rate resulted in a farmer being able to pay $1 more
for ewes, but farmers need to remember a sheep's performance is a result of its environment as
well as its genetics, so the performance gains may be less than expected when the sheep is
moved to a less favourable environment.
[top]

Intellectual
Property Explained
Coca-cola is the biggest selling drink in the world, and what is their most closely guarded secret?
The famous ingredient Merchandise 7X, one of the most successful examples of intellectual property
in the world today.
Intellectual property comprises "creations of the mind": inventions (patents), trademarks, industrial designs and Copyright, as well
as the ownership of that property. It is the means by which a business protects the knowledge they have spent money and time to acquire,
in order to secure an edge in the market.
But how do they ensure they can continue to use that knowledge? This is a fundamental question for researchers and businesses that
have developed new products.
AbacusBio managing director, Peter Fennessy, says that protecting these trade secrets is vital, but can be expensive and difficult.
“AbacusBio can advise a business how to protect its position. For example, genetic markers are being used increasingly in plant and
animal breeding. There are a lot of patents involved in individual genetic markers and their use. AbacusBio has worked with a number
of different clients to work out how to protect and develop their commercial business using these genetic markers.”
There are a number of different ways to protect intellectual property. Taking out a patent, which makes it illegal for others to use
the patented technology for a fixed period of time, is a standard method. But applying for a patent can be complicated and expensive,
and the business must have the money and power to defend the patent in court if necessary. Another disadvantage is that the technology
must be disclosed to the Patent Office, and therefore the world, for it to be protected.
Trademarks are distinctive names and/or signs that distinguish the goods or services of one business from another's. They are the
cornerstone of a company's brand, and are therefore very important for successful marketing.
Copyright is a special form of intellectual property used to protect literary and artistic works.
Peter says the best way for a business to protect its intellectual property can be counter-intuitive. Making your intellectual property
"common knowledge" (available in the public domain) can prevent competitors registering a patent for the technology themselves, which
therefore retains your own ability to use the technology you developed.
Often, keeping this “freedom-to-operate” is the most critical requirement for a business, and this approach allows the business to
focus its time and resources on being first to market and therefore gaining a market advantage. It is also free to combine its
technology with other technologies to stay ahead of its competitors.
Determining how you will protect your business's intellectual property requires a strong understanding of scientific, business and
legal practices, so the advice of an independent expert is invaluable. Peter Fennessy and AbacusBio can advise you of the pros and
cons of each option appropriate to your business's individual needs, and help you to decide the best solution for you.
[top]
|